ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026
Streamlined calculation of kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with population-based arterial input function and a whole-kidney model.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess kidney function, but artifacts and complex post-processing limit its use. We calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) by combining a population-based arterial input function (pAIF) with a whole-kidney pharmacokinetic model (WKPM). We also compared DCE-MRI eGFR and RPF with serum eGFR and arterial spin labeling (ASL) derived RPF, respectively. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a prospective single-center study, 43 patients (30 M/13 F, 59.0 ± 11.8 y) with renal masses underwent multiparametric 1.5-T MRI, before and 3 months after nephrectomy (n = 15), including coronal, fat-saturated volumetric DCE-MRI (5-s temporal resolution) and background-suppressed pseudocontinuous ASL. DCE-MRI eGFR and RPF were measured by WKPM, incorporating individual-based arterial input function (iAIF) and population-based arterial input function (pAIF) as inputs. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and Mann-Whitney U statistics were used.
resultsSerum eGFR (mean 67.55 mL/min/1.73 m²) and DCE-MRI (mean eGFR pAIF 59.49, iAIF 63.60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were measured in 51 MRIs: correlation with serum eGFR was stronger for pAIF (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) than iAIF (r = 0.33, p = 0.018), with comparable Bland-Altman bias (-11.9% and -9.1%, respectively). RPF was measured by both DCE-MRI and ASL in 21 MRIs: mean RPF was 229.3 (ASL), 229.7 (pAIF), and 390.4 (iAIF) mL/min (p = 0.018). Correlation of pAIF RPF with ASL-derived RPF (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) was stronger than for iAIF RPF (r = 0.53, p = 0.014), with lower Bland-Altman bias (pAIF -1.0% versus iAIF 39.5%).
conclusionDCE-MRI using pAIF and WKPM provides simplified, robust single-kidney function estimates. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study proposes a simplified DCE-MRI post-processing method using a population-based arterial input function combined with a whole-kidney pharmacokinetic model. It avoids complex corticomedullary segmentation and minimizes aortic region-of-interest variability, and enables clinically feasible estimation of single-kidney function, supporting broader adoption of renal DCE-MRI in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Population-based arterial input function reduces inter-observer variability and sensitivity to aortic region-of-interest placement artifacts. Whole-kidney modeling avoids complex segmentation of the cortex and medulla regions. DCE-MRI using population-AIF and whole-kidney modeling yields eGFR and RPF significantly correlated with serum and ASL references. Streamlined post-processing workflow supports broader routine clinical use of DCE-MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.