Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012713›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2026

Safety Envelopes and Continuous Assurance for Updates and Postmarket Surveillance in Digital Mental Health Technologies.

Siddharth Nandagopal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Siddharth NandagopalIndependent Researcher, Cambridge, USA. sid.nandhan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5958-6204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) increasingly behave as continuously updated services, yet most oversight mechanisms still evaluate them as comparatively static products. This creates a governance gap where software change, deployment context, and mental health risk interact. This perspective presents SECA (Safety Envelope and Continuous Assurance) as a governance framework for regulated software as a medical device (SaMD) DMHTs, with extension to the wider “adjacent app” market through procurement and accreditation levers. Rather than treating oversight as review of a fixed version, SECA combines a bounded Safety Envelope, which pre-specifies change classes and evidence expectations, with Continuous Assurance, which monitors real-world performance and supports escalation, pause, or rollback when needed. The framework is mapped to the EU/UK, US, and India by aligning with existing post-market and vigilance structures while highlighting context triggers especially relevant in mental health, including population vulnerability, language and cultural setting, and interaction design changes that may alter help-seeking or crisis behavior.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingDigital HealthHumansIndiaSoftwareUnited StatesContinuous assuranceDigital mental health technologies (DMHTs)Post-market surveillance (PMS)Predetermined change control plan (PCCP)Significant changeSoftware as a medical device (SaMD)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.