Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012695›Full record

ReviewUrolithiasis2026

A retrospective narrative review of kidney stone composition in patients from two race groups having different stone occurrence profiles: a hypothesis-generating study of stone formation based on stone composition alone.

Allen L Rodgers, Grace Carmichael

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allen L RodgersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. allen.rodgers@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4079-4998
Grace CarmichaelDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Statistical Consulting Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-8892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of kidney stone composition have been ongoing for over 60 years but have failed to establish a compelling relationship between stone composition and stone pathophysiology. As such, a focussed investigation involving a different approach to those employed previously is warranted. The stone anomaly in South Africa provides an ideal scenario for such an investigation. In this country, stones occur in the white population group (W) but historically they have been relatively rare in their black African counterparts (B). Accounting for this anomaly in terms of urine composition has not been convincingly described. We undertook to achieve better understanding of this anomaly and the riddles of stone formation in general by comparing compositions and their proportionate presence in stones formed in these groups. Composition of 3783 stones were retrieved from stone composition files in our research laboratory. Each was analysed by x-ray powder diffraction and was classified according to the race and gender of the patients from whom they were obtained and according to the presence of a main component, defined as constituting ≥ 50% of the overall composition. Chi-squared tests were used to test differences in proportions between the groups and for correlation p-values. Results were adjusted for multiple-comparisons using a Bonferroni correction of the p-values. Phi coefficients and p-values were calculated using functions from the R-library. Correlation tables were generated using the R library ‘flextable’, while correlation plots were generated using the Corrplot function from the R library ‘DescTools’. Statistical significance was assigned to correlation coefficients ≥ 0.25, p ≤ 0.05. Systematic literature searches were conducted to identify compositional, clinical and pathophysiological associations. The proportion of calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) stones was significantly lower in B than in W (7.2% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.006). Uric acid dihydrate (UAD), sodium urate and ammonium acid urate stones were common in W, but were absent in B. Intergender differences and correlation analyses were unremarkable as they were in alignment with global observations. Literature searches highlighted weaker crystal-cell adhesive forces associated with COD compared to the monohydrate (COM) and relatively slower transformation kinetics of the former to the latter. Associations between UAD, type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome and Randall’s plaque were also featured in these searches. We speculate that smaller proportions of COD in B might be indicative of a mechanism involving the transformation kinetics of COD to COM and the presence of weaker crystal-cell adhesion forces associated with COD. We also hypothesize that the absence of UAD, NaUr and AAU in B is indicative of a loss of promotive capacity for the formation of Randall’s plaque, substantiated by an apparent lower incidence of the latter in B, and a concomitantly lower stone occurrence rate in this group. Finally, we suggest that the South African stone anomaly might be related to the reported lower metabolic syndrome occurrence in B.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiWhite PeopleBlack PeopleCalcium OxalateHumansRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaX-Ray DiffractionCalcium OxalateInter-genderInter-raceKidney stonesPathophysiological associationsStone compositionStone pathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID42012695
PMCPMC13099717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.