ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
The adverse prognostic impact of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity appears attenuated in early breast cancer patients with treatment-relevant neutropenia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMaintaining a relative dose intensity (RDI) ≥ 85% during chemotherapy is established as a critical threshold for optimal outcomes in early breast cancer. This study investigates whether the prognostic impact of reduced RDI differs based on the presence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia requiring treatment modifications (rCIN).
methodsWe analyzed 730 patients with early breast cancer receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy at the University Hospital Tübingen between 2014 and 2021. rCIN was defined as any dose reduction > 15%, delay ≥ 5 days, or discontinuation attributed to neutropenia per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Patients were stratified into four groups based on RDI (≥ 85% vs. < 85%) and rCIN status. Differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and predictors of DFS were evaluated by Cox regression.
resultsrCIN occurred in 21.8% of patients, with 59.7% of rCIN patients receiving RDI < 85% versus 16.1% of non-rCIN patients (p < 0.001). Despite lower RDI, rCIN patients maintained similar pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant therapy. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with RDI < 85% without rCIN had significantly worse DFS and OS than the reference group with RDI ≥ 85% without rCIN (DFS p = 0.003; OS p = 0.002), while patients with RDI < 85% with rCIN showed comparable survival to high-RDI groups (all pairwise p > 0.170). Direct comparison between the two reduced-RDI groups was not statistically significant for either DFS or OS (DFS p = 0.055; OS p = 0.159). Cox regression confirmed RDI < 85% as a negative prognostic factor (HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.38-4.65; p = 0.003). The rCIN × RDI < 85% interaction term was not statistically significant (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.12-1.60; p = 0.212).
conclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, reduced RDI was associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in patients without rCIN. By contrast, patients with RDI < 85% and rCIN showed no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier survival, and similar pathological complete response rates were observed despite lower RDI in the neoadjuvant subgroup. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.