ArticleMikrochimica acta2026
Metal-organic frameworks-coated stainless-steel needles for solid-phase microextraction of phthalates.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three MIL-53(Al, Cr, and Fe) MOFs were synthesized and evaluated for extracting phthalates. As the best adsorbent examined by batch extraction, MIL-53(Cr) was selected for the preparation of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) devices. For this purpose, MOF particles were supported with commercial silicone sealants and dispersed inside stainless-steel needles. This design provides enhanced protection since the adsorbent is attached to the inner wall of a stainless-steel holder. The SEM images confirmed that the adsorbent morphology was uniform and completely linked to the inner needle wall, and the MOF particles were in their original structure, indicating that the SPME needles were made properly. The performance of the prepared needles was optimized in terms of the extraction/releasing time and temperature, and the analyte concentrations. The recoveries ranged between 84.7% for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and 96.1% for diisopentyl phthalate after 30 min of the extraction. The good extraction efficiency was attributed to the high surface area of MOFs and the presence of various interactions, including hydrogen bonding, dipole–dipole interactions, π-π stacking, van der Waals forces, and pore matching between the analytes and the prepared MOF-based sorbent. The linear range was 0.10 − 1300 μg L−1, and the LODs varied between 0.04 and 0.10 μg L−1. Intraday and interday RSDs were ≤ 6.6% for all solutes using the same SPME needle, while the reproducibility of the needle construction (n = 3) was ≤ 14.1%. A single needle could be used for at least 70 extraction/desorption replicate cycles without a significant decrease in its extraction capacity. The developed MIL-53(Cr)-based SPME needles were primarily applied to the determination of phthalates in commercial bottled water packaged in PET, glass, or aluminum containers, with detected concentrations ranging from 0.14 to 5.61 μg L−1. The applicability and robustness of the method were further demonstrated through analysis of stream and sewage water, vehicle exhaust emissions, and perfume samples using both direct immersion and headspace sampling modes. Compared to previously reported SPME methods, the needles showed comparable LODs and recoveries but a wider linear range due to the larger adsorbent amount in longer extraction needles (45 mm vs. 10 mm). These results demonstrate the effective preparation and application of MOF-based SPME needles for phthalate analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42012564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.