ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Identification and prioritisation of tumour antigen candidates from 79 glioblastoma transcriptomes.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumour with limited responsiveness to current immunotherapeutic approaches, partly due to its low mutational burden and intra-tumour heterogeneity. A systematic understanding of the tumour antigen landscape is therefore essential for advancing tumour immunology and supporting rational development of immunotherapeutic strategies. In this study, we performed whole-transcriptome sequencing of RNA extracted from 79 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) IDH-wildtype GBM samples to systematically identify and prioritise candidate tumour antigens derived from three sources: single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), overexpressed tumour-associated antigens (TAAs), and gene fusion events. Candidate peptides were evaluated using integrated computational criteria, including transcript expression, predicted antigen processing features, peptide-HLA binding affinity and stability. Across the cohort, mutation-derived tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) were largely private to individual samples, whereas TAAs constituted a larger and more recurrent candidate pool. Despite comparable predicted binding characteristics across antigen classes, recurrence patterns differed substantially, reflecting their distinct biological origins. Fusion-derived candidates were rare and sample-specific. Predicted peptide presentation was disproportionately associated with a limited subset of HLA class I alleles. Collectively, this study provides a systematically prioritized catalogue of transcriptionally expressed GBM antigen candidates and offers a comparative evaluation of mutation-, expression-, and fusion-derived antigen sources within a unified transcriptome-based framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.