ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Analysis of DRG remuneration of acute fracture procedures versus elective total arthroplasty for the German health care system - Is elective total arthroplasty really more cost-effective?
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeElective arthroplasty is considered a cost-effective procedure compared to trauma-related surgical interventions. This study aims to compare remuneration, certain ratios regarding implant costs, operation (OR) time and length of stay (LOS) as well as contribution margins including personnel costs for acute fracture interventions and elective arthroplasty procedures at the hip and shoulder joint in the aG-DRG system.
methodsBased on billing data of 212 inpatient treatment cases from a University Orthopaedic Trauma Department reimbursements of nail fixation and hemi-arthroplasty (HA) for proximal femoral fractures versus elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis were analysed. Locking plate fixation and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for proximal humeral fractures were compared to elective rTSA for osteoarthritis. Different ratios of the DRG remuneration in relation to LOS, OR time and implant costs but also personnel costs and contribution margins were calculated.
resultsDRG reimbursement was highest for fracture arthroplasty of the shoulder (9.050 EUR, rTSA) and the hip (6.930 EUR, HA). Regarding LOS, DRG reimbursement was highest for elective rTSA (1.641 EUR/day). Nail fixation of proximal femoral fractures showed the highest DRG reimbursement regarding OR time (111 EUR/min) and implant costs (15 EUR/EUR). The contribution margin was highest for fracture rTSA (6.339 EUR) and lowest for elective THA (3.842 EUR).
conclusionElective total hip and shoulder arthroplasty is not generally more cost-effective in the aG-DRG system. Acute fracture-related interventions seem economically more advantageous with regard to implant costs and OR time, elective total arthoplasty seems more profitable regarding LOS in the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.