SynthesisBioscience reports2026
A systematic review and meta-analysis of shRNA-IL-6-engineered CAR-T cells for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a stepping stone toward risk-free immunotherapy.
Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, especially those targeting CD19, stands as a breakthrough in treating relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Yet, preventing immune-related adverse events, like severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), remains a significant concern. This meta-analysis looked at the efficacy and safety of interleukin-6 knockdown CAR-T therapy. The study's primary outcomes included the incidence of CRS, ICANS, and the number of patients achieving an early complete response (CR) and overall response (OR) rates at one-month post-infusion of anti-CD19 shRNA-engineered CAR-T cells. The random-effects model was used to estimate summary effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Out of 275 studies screened, 7 studies were eligible (n = 178 patients). The pooled OR and CR rates were 88% (95% CI: 81-92) and 84% (95% CI: 78-89), respectively, with no heterogeneity detected. Among 147 patients, 116 (78%, 95% CI: 68-85) developed CRS, whereas 46 (28%, CI: 21%-35%) out of 178 were affected by severe grades (≥3). While ICANS was detected in 13 out of 159 patients (13%, CI: 2%-51%, I2 = 69.5%), three studies confirmed the absence of severe grade ICANS. According to GRADE assessment, current analysis presents low certainty of evidence supporting investigated outcomes, except for ICANS (any grade) that was deemed very low. More importantly, as all included studies were conducted in China, the findings may not be readily generalizable to other healthcare systems and ethnically diverse populations. Therefore, our confidence in the effect estimates is limited and it may vary from true estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.