Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42012381›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026

A Combined Speech-Language and Counseling Intervention for Primary Progressive Aphasia: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Outcomes.

Kristin Schaffer Mendez, William S Evans, Lisa D Wauters, Christina D Dutcher, Christina Philburn, Maya L Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristin Schaffer MendezDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-9225
William S EvansDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-3473
Lisa D WautersDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0001-8191-9366
Christina D DutcherDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-3158-8674
Christina PhilburnCoco Psychotherapy and Education, Austin, TX.
Maya L HenryDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-8745-6451

Funding

Establishing Evidence-based Treatment for Speech and Language in Primary Progressive AphasiaR01DC016291 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HENRY, MAYA · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Evaluating a Combined Communication and Counseling Intervention in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Pilot Feasibility StudyF31DC019044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SCHAFFER, KRISTIN MARIE · 2020 to 2022
$74k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC019044NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) face negative psychosocial repercussions, yet few studies have investigated counseling for this population. In a prior study, a novel intervention encompassing script training and aphasia-modified cognitive behavioral therapy was piloted with an individual with PPA, yielding promising results. The purpose of this study is to determine the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention for individuals with different PPA subtypes, with secondary aims of understanding preliminary treatment outcomes and evaluating the sensitivity of selected psychosocial measures.

methodNine participants with PPA were recruited (three with nonfluent/agrammatic variant, three with logopenic variant, and three with semantic variant). Acceptability was measured using a posttreatment questionnaire. Feasibility was examined via intervention adherence, independent practice engagement, retention, assessment completion, interrater reliability, and fidelity ratings. Speech-language outcomes were evaluated via hypothesis testing using simulation analysis from pre- to posttreatment for all participants and from pretreatment to follow-up time points for six participants. Counseling outcomes at posttreatment were measured via psychosocial scales and analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests.

resultsFindings indicate that this treatment is acceptable and feasible. All participants demonstrated significant improvement in speech-language performance following treatment, with five participants demonstrating significant improvement up to 1 year posttreatment. Despite promising qualitative evidence regarding counseling outcomes, a sensitive quantitative measure of psychosocial functioning was not identified.

conclusionsPairing tailored speech-language interventions with counseling for individuals with heterogeneous PPA phenotypes is acceptable and feasible. Preliminary outcomes indicate positive communication findings and that alternative psychosocial measures may be beneficial in a future efficacy trial. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.31836103.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveCounselingLanguage TherapySpeech TherapyAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42012381
PMCPMC13274530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.