ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib for Patients With Alopecia Areata: A Retrospective Multi-Center Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approval of baricitinib and ritlecitinib for alopecia areata (AA) marks the beginning of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor era in AA treatment. Tofacitinib, a first-generation JAK1/3 inhibitor, has theoretical potential to treat AA; however, real-world evidence, particularly on comparative outcomes across patient subgroups and patient-reported outcomes, remains limited. In this multi-center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in refractory AA using objective clinical assessments, including SALT scores and four-point eyebrow and eyelash scales, alongside patient-reported outcomes, namely DLQI/CDLQI and VAS scores. After 12 weeks of treatment, tofacitinib substantially reduced SALT scores and promoted eyebrow and eyelash regrowth, accompanied by meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Efficacy was greater in patients with severe AA than in those with non-severe AA and was consistent across pediatric and adult populations. Some patients experienced transient disease worsening, which was manageable without treatment escalation. Despite the study's small sample size and retrospective design, tofacitinib demonstrated significant efficacy in both objective and patient-reported measures, supporting its use as a viable therapeutic option for severe AA and underscoring the value of incorporating patient-reported outcomes in real-world studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.