ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Environmental and mutational modulation of collateral fitness effects informs their mechanisms.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fitness effects of mutations that do not arise from changes in a protein's ability to perform its physiological functions (called collateral fitness effects or CFEs) are an understudied aspect of fitness landscapes. We have previously systematically measured the CFEs of all possible single amino acid substitutions in four proteins and found the frequency of deleterious mutations to vary by two orders of magnitude. Of these proteins, TEM-1 β-lactamase had the highest frequency, and deleterious mutations caused TEM-1 aggregation. Here, we systematically measured TEM-1 collateral fitness landscapes in environments and situations expected to alter protein aggregation or protein stability. We found a moderate correlation between deleterious CFEs and predicted thermodynamic stability effects in TEM-1's α-domain. Empirically, we found that the frequency and magnitude of deleterious CFEs can be reduced by altering the growth environment to disfavor aggregation (i.e. reducing the growth temperature or shifting to minimal media) or by stabilizing TEM-1 (via the M182T mutation or the addition of the β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam to the growth medium). However, although raising the growth temperature to favor aggregation exacerbated deleterious CFEs of many mutations, many mutations' effects were reduced. Furthermore, although reductions in CFEs occurred with reductions in TEM-1 aggregation for some mutants, for many mutants, they did not. We propose that mutational destabilization exposes protein motifs that can cause deleterious CFEs, but that these motifs and those that cause aggregation are not necessarily the same motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.