Trial reportJournal of rehabilitation medicine2026
Effect of inspiratory muscle training on inspiratory muscle strength in adults with post-COVID-19 condition and inspiratory muscle weakness: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary on: "Effect of inspiratory muscle training on inspiratory muscle strength in adults with post-COVID-19 condition and inspiratory muscle weakness: a randomized controlled trial".Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate the effect of inspiratory muscle training in adults with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) and inspiratory muscle weakness.
designRandomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Adults with PCC and inspiratory muscle weakness.
methodsParticipants were randomized to inspiratory muscle training twice daily plus individualized exercise twice weekly or exercise alone, with weekly follow-ups over 8 weeks. PRIMARY OUTCOME: inspiratory muscle strength (Maximal Inspiratory Pressure). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: expiratory muscle strength (Maximal Expiratory Pressure); functional capacity (Six‑Minute Walk Test; One‑Minute Sit‑to‑Stand); lung function (spirometry); dyspnoea (mMRC); respiratory symptoms (chest tightness, impaired deep breathing, breathing‑related pain); cough frequency (CAAT cough item); fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale); physical activity (Frändin-Grimby Activity Scale); activity limitations (Patient‑Specific Functional Scale); and health-related quality of life (EQ‑5D‑5L). Intention-to-treat analyses used imputed missing data. Estimated sample size: 90.
resultsForty-four participants were included (median age 47; 82% women; n = 22/group). Between‑group differences favoured the intervention for inspiratory muscle strength (mean difference: 18%; 95% CI: 5-30; OR for clinically meaningful improvement: 7.08, 95% CI: 1.31-38.32) and cough frequency. No other between-group differences were observed.
conclusionInspiratory muscle training may improve inspiratory muscle strength and reduce cough frequency, but limited sample size and underrepresentation of the most severely affected warrant cautious interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.