SynthesisMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2026
Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: A vital component we can no longer overlook.
Synthesis in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: from diagnosis to disease progression.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe conducted a systematic review to examine the use of spinal cord (SC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical trials for multiple sclerosis (MS) and discussed the significant challenges that impede its widespread implementation. MAJOR
findingsWe identified 291 phase II and phase III clinical trials. Of these, 228 (78.4%) included at least one MRI outcome. Eight clinical trials (2.7%) were planned to include at least one SC MRI outcome, but only three (1.0%) reported related methodologies or results. The MRI metrics considered in these studies included cervical SC cross-sectional area (1.0%) and SC T
conclusionA very small proportion of clinical trials have used SC MRI metrics as outcome measures. Given the substantial impact of SC disease on disability, it is essential to standardize SC imaging, post-processing, and analytical methods across centres to enhance the effectiveness and applicability of SC MRI in future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.