ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2026
The Development and Validation of Models of Risk for Behaviours That Challenge in Children With Developmental Disabilities: A Novel Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren with developmental disabilities show a high prevalence of behaviours that challenge (BtC). Thus, harnessing known risk markers to target early intervention to children at the greatest risk of BtC is essential. In this study, machine learning techniques were used to develop prediction models of risk (no, low and high severity behaviour) for different BtC (self-injurious behaviour, aggression, property destruction, 'any BtC'). A secondary aim was to assess the external validation of these models to predict future behaviour.
methodCaregivers of individuals with developmental disabilities completed the Self-injury, Aggression and Destruction Screening Questionnaire. One dataset (n = 778) was used to train and test models to establish internal validation. Algorithms were created using random forest classifiers, K-nearest neighbours, multiple logistic regressions and Gaussian mixture models (GMM) for each type of behaviour. External validation utilising a second dataset of caregivers (n = 121) completing the SAD-SQ at baseline and 12 months later was then conducted. OUTCOMES: Across internal and external validation, the random forest classifiers and GMM algorithms for any BtC showed the highest number of correct classifications with fair to good recall and precision, with 83.5% of people at risk of BtC correctly predicted. Predictions of persistence and incidence of behaviour over 12 months was also good (83.5% and 83.3%, respectively).
interpretationThe novel prediction models showed the ability to predict BtC for children with developmental disabilities. Such models have applicability to clinical practice to inform provision of early preventative interventions for BtC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.