ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2026
Can machine learning support infection control measures by predicting carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales colonization at admission?
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) colonization is crucial for infection control; however, microbiological testing may delay detection and be costly. Machine learning may enhance predictive analytics for timely identification of at-risk patients.
methodsFour machine learning models: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, were used to predict CPE colonization within 48 hours of admission using microbiological and demographic data. Model performance was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) evaluated topological separability of CPE-positive cases and CPE-negative controls.
resultsFrom January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024, 453,372 fecal specimens were submitted for CPE screening, with 194,917 (43.0%) collected within 48 hours of admission, comprising 3,328 CPE-positive cases (1.7%) and 191,589 CPE-negative controls. The Gradient Boosting classifier showed the best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.598, sensitivity of 54.4%, and specificity of 59.1%. Demographic factors (age ≥ 75 and male sex), history of hospitalization, and known CPE colonization in the past year, and admission specialty (general medicine and general surgery) were consistently included in all models as top predictors. UMAP revealed significant overlap between CPE-positive and CPE-negative patients, indicating challenges in differentiating the risk profiles.
conclusionsThis study highlights the complexities of using machine learning to predict CPE colonization within 48 hours of admission. The low AUROC values suggest that the models may not effectively predict CPE colonization at the patient level, potentially due to inherent rarity of events and overlapping risk profiles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.