Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2026
Effectiveness of Organized Strategies to Enhance Access to Preventive Oral Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Care.
Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This randomized clinical trial assessed the performance of organized, risk-based oral cancer (OC) screening strategies compared with the conventional opportunistic approach. Conducted from December 2023 to December 2024 across 35 primary health care (PHC) units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the study included adults aged ≥ 35 years identified as tobacco users in the public electronic medical record system and considered high-risk for preventive oral examination (POE). PHC units were allocated to three groups: control (opportunistic screening without active invitation; 12 units), experimental I (organized invitation for POE plus home-visit support; 11 units), and experimental II (organized invitation for POE plus an awareness campaign; 12 units). The 23 PHC units implementing organized screening included 2735 registered tobacco users, whereas the 12 units maintaining opportunistic screening included 1048. Consequently, POE coverage reached 77.2% in the organized screening arms versus 3.6% under opportunistic screening (p < 0.05). POE adherence was higher with organized invitation plus community awareness (77.2%) than with home-visit support (58.1%). A total of 15 biopsies were performed within the organized screening groups, identifying 6 cases of oral potentially malignant disorders and 5 cases of OC. In contrast, biopsies conducted outside the screening program demonstrated significantly lower detection rates (p < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate that organized, invitation-based screening integrated into PHC can substantially expand access to early diagnosis among high-risk and socially vulnerable individuals who would otherwise remain unscreened, reinforcing PHC as a strategic and equitable setting for sustainable early OC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.