Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011789›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2026

Effectiveness of Organized Strategies to Enhance Access to Preventive Oral Cancer Screening Among High-Risk Individuals in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Care.

Marcia Frias Pinto Marinho, Keith Bullia da Fonseca Simas, Patrícia Vinas Heras, Claudia Aparecida Serra da Cruz, Amanda Martins Dos Santos Bessa, Mário José Romãnach, Aline Corrêa Abrahão, Maria Augusta Visconti, Michelle Agostini

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcia Frias Pinto MarinhoSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-8140
Keith Bullia da Fonseca SimasMunicipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-1289
Patrícia Vinas HerasMunicipal Health Department of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-2312
Claudia Aparecida Serra da CruzSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3156-5936
Amanda Martins Dos Santos BessaSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9687-791X
Mário José RomãnachSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-5916
Aline Corrêa AbrahãoSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-3234
Maria Augusta ViscontiSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-8387
Michelle AgostiniSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-337X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 420633/2023-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 00x0ma614Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/210.635/2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial assessed the performance of organized, risk-based oral cancer (OC) screening strategies compared with the conventional opportunistic approach. Conducted from December 2023 to December 2024 across 35 primary health care (PHC) units in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the study included adults aged ≥ 35 years identified as tobacco users in the public electronic medical record system and considered high-risk for preventive oral examination (POE). PHC units were allocated to three groups: control (opportunistic screening without active invitation; 12 units), experimental I (organized invitation for POE plus home-visit support; 11 units), and experimental II (organized invitation for POE plus an awareness campaign; 12 units). The 23 PHC units implementing organized screening included 2735 registered tobacco users, whereas the 12 units maintaining opportunistic screening included 1048. Consequently, POE coverage reached 77.2% in the organized screening arms versus 3.6% under opportunistic screening (p < 0.05). POE adherence was higher with organized invitation plus community awareness (77.2%) than with home-visit support (58.1%). A total of 15 biopsies were performed within the organized screening groups, identifying 6 cases of oral potentially malignant disorders and 5 cases of OC. In contrast, biopsies conducted outside the screening program demonstrated significantly lower detection rates (p < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate that organized, invitation-based screening integrated into PHC can substantially expand access to early diagnosis among high-risk and socially vulnerable individuals who would otherwise remain unscreened, reinforcing PHC as a strategic and equitable setting for sustainable early OC detection.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Services AccessibilityMouth NeoplasmsAdherence InterventionsAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrimary Health Careearly diagnosisoral cancerpublic healthscreening

Identifiers

PMID42011789
PMCPMC13432453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.