ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
Sublethal Dermal Toxicity of Drilling Fluid and Its Effects on Hematological, Biochemical and Histopathological Parameters in Rats.
Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxic effects of drilling fluid (DF) on the skin in a subacute experimental model. Sexually mature outbred rats of both sexes were used (8 males and 8 females per group), weighing 180-220 g. Dermal exposure was performed for 14 days with monitoring of general condition, behavior, and feed and water intake. Body weight, vertical rearing, and grooming behavior were recorded on days 1, 7, and 14. At the end of the experiment, animals were euthanized for biological sample collection. Peripheral blood parameters, including hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were analyzed. Morphohistological examination of the epidermis, dermis, hair follicles, liver, and kidneys was performed. The elemental composition of the drilling fluid and drill cuttings was determined using atomic absorption and emission spectroscopy. Experimental animals exhibited reduced mobility and decreased feed and water intake by day 7. Body weight initially declined and subsequently increased. Dermal exposure to DF resulted in a significant increase in leukocyte, neutrophil, and eosinophil counts and was associated with alterations in detoxification enzyme activity (ALT, AST, and LDH). Histopathological changes were observed in the skin, liver, and kidneys, indicating dermal-resorptive toxicity. The results demonstrate that drilling fluid possesses dermal-resorptive toxicity following cutaneous exposure, causing not only local skin alterations but also systemic disturbances involving the hematopoietic, immune, and detoxification systems. The combination of clinical-behavioral, hematological, biochemical, and morphological changes confirms the potential occupational hazard of dermal contact with drilling fluids and substantiates the need to consider this route of exposure in occupational risk assessment. The findings provide an experimental basis for improving sanitary and hygienic standards, developing preventive measures, and conducting further toxicological studies, including investigations of chronic exposure, dose-response relationships, and the contribution of individual drilling fluid components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.