ArticleCureus2026
Role of Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation of Age and Laboratory Parameters with Urine Flow Cytometry and Culture Results in Patients with Urinary Tract Infections.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTraditional diagnostics rely on microscopy, dipstick tests, and the gold‑standard urine culture, which is reliable but time‑consuming. Flow cytometry for urinary analysis offers a fast, objective, and highly automated approach that can improve the selection of samples for culture and accelerate clinical decision‑making. Flow cytometry uses fluorescent and scatter detection to quantify cells, bacteria, and other particles in urine, processing thousands of events per sample and generating parameters that correlate with the presence of infection.
methodsThis retrospective study included 200 hospitalized adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the Clinic for Infectious Diseases, University Clinical Center Tuzla in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. A urinary tract infection (UTI) was diagnosed based on standardized clinical and laboratory criteria. Urine samples were analyzed using the Sysmex UF‑4000 flow cytometer, and diagnostic thresholds for leukocyte and bacterial counts were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Youden's Index.
resultsAmong 200 hospitalized patients, females predominated (124 vs. 76). Optimal cut-offs were ≥120/µL for leukocytes (area under the curve (AUC) 0.88, sensitivity 91.2%, specificity 75.3%) and ≥1367/µL for bacteria (AUC 0.95, sensitivity 90.3%, specificity 90.7%). Sex-specific analyses showed higher accuracy in males, with cut-offs of ≥1012/µL for bacteria (AUC 0.97) and ≥122/µL for leukocytes (AUC 0.94), while in females, the best thresholds were ≥1797/µL for bacteria (AUC 0.94) and ≥113/µL for leukocytes (AUC 0.84). The empirically developed UTI risk score (0-2) further improved stratification: Score 0 strongly predicted negative cultures (NPV >97%), while Score 2 was highly associated with positive cultures (PPV >94%).
conclusionsAutomated urine flow cytometry offers a fast and accurate screening tool for UTIs, with bacterial counts outperforming leukocytes in diagnostic reliability. Sex-specific cut-offs and the UTI risk score enhance clinical applicability by improving stratification and reducing unnecessary cultures. While findings support integration of flow cytometry into routine practice, the single-center design, hospitalized cohort, and exclusion of pregnant women and children limit broader generalization, warranting validation in larger, multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.