ReviewCureus2026
Perceived Stress and Psychological Distress in Prosthodontic Residents: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Evidence Gaps in Occupational Burnout.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress, psychological distress, and burnout are recognized occupational hazards in dentistry; however, the burden has not been synthesized separately for prosthodontics despite the specialty's distinctive combination of high-precision rehabilitation, prolonged treatment cycles, aesthetic expectations, laboratory dependency, and repeated adjustments. This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidance and was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420261277566). The review had three objectives: (1) to synthesize perceived stress and psychological distress among prosthodontists and prosthodontic residents, (2) to determine whether validated instruments have been used to measure occupational burnout in this population, and (3) to appraise the methodological quality of the available evidence. Electronic searches were undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Google Scholar, and supplementary sources from inception to 10 January 2026. Additional searches included Shodhaganga, targeted web searches, and backward citation tracking. Three cross-sectional studies met the eligibility criteria. Two studies evaluated North American prosthodontic residents, and one evaluated postgraduate prosthodontic trainees in Saudi Arabia. Across studies, stress clustered around academic overload, faculty-related pressures, lack of time for personal life or leisure, inadequate support, and clinical or examination requirements. One North American study reported that more than one-third of residents exceeded the study-defined threshold for high stress, whereas a multicenter US study found that prosthodontics residents showed higher mean stress scores than pediatric dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery residents across multiple domains. Importantly, no eligible study used a validated burnout inventory; therefore, prosthodontics-specific burnout prevalence could not be estimated. JBI appraisal showed variable methodological quality, with concerns centering on confounding, sampling, and response rates. Current evidence, therefore, indicates elevated stress among prosthodontic residents, but a major evidence gap remains regarding occupational burnout measured using validated instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.