ArticleDigital health
Machine learning-based classification of HIV viral load suppression in low-resource settings.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and interpret an interpretable machine learning model for classifying HIV viral load suppression (VLS) using routinely collected clinical data in a low-resource Ethiopian cohort, enabling early identification of patients at risk of treatment failure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of 4,152 patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia (March 2005-December 2024). Eight machine learning algorithms, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, and XGBoost, were trained and optimized to classify binary VLS outcomes. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The best-performing model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to identify significant predictors and their directional impacts. Results: The optimized Gradient Boosting model achieved the highest performance with 76% accuracy, 0.74 F1-score, and 0.79 AUC-ROC. Baseline CD4 category and duration on ART (months) emerged as the most influential predictors. SHAP analysis revealed that longer ART duration and higher baseline CD4 count were associated with increased odds of suppression, while advanced WHO clinical stage (Stage 4) and male sex were associated with unsuppressed viral load. Individual-level predictions were visualized using waterfall plots to enhance clinical interpretability. Conclusion: An interpretable Gradient Boosting model can reliably predict viral load suppression using routinely collected clinical data in resource-limited settings. The model's predictions align with established clinical knowledge, offering a potential decision-support tool for identifying patients at risk of treatment failure at this single site, pending external validation in other cohorts and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.