ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
International clinical consensus on leukocyte adhesion deficiency-I: Modified Delphi analysis.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marnetegragene Autotemcel: First Approval.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- The burden of severe leukocyte adhesion deficiency, type I (LAD-I): A multiple-case study from the caregiver's perspective.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-I (LAD-I) is a rare autosomal-recessive inborn error of immunity caused by mutations in Objective: We sought to provide international, expert-led consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and severity classification of LAD-I; and to characterize standard of care and burden of illness for patients with severe LAD-I. Methods: Twelve geographically diverse experts (3 steering committee members and 9 Delphi participants) were recruited to participate in a modified Delphi study. Two rounds of online questionnaires were conducted, plus a virtual workshop. Final recommendations were approved by all experts. Results: Consensus was achieved across 26 recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of patients with LAD-I. Experts agreed LAD-I severity classification should consider laboratory assessment in addition to clinical phenotype within a comprehensive framework. In the absence of symptoms, particularly in infancy, diagnosis and severity classification is based on flow cytometric assessments (CD18 and CD11a/CD11b expression) and molecular genetic testing or family history. Conclusion: The framework developed by the Delphi panel will aid clinicians in the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of patients with LAD-I. Recommendations support best clinical practice that can lead to improved clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.