Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011409›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligoprogressive breast cancer: A site-specific analysis of the prospective, phase-II RADIANT trial.

Kara M Ruicci, Joelle Helou, Aisling Barry, Xiang Y Ye, C Anne Koch, Jennifer Croke, Kathy Han, Danielle Rodin, Ezra Hahn, Jennifer Y Y Kwan and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04122469 (The Role of Stereo-tActic BoDy RadIotherApy iN Oligo-Progressive MalignanT Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04122469 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Role of Stereo-tActic BoDy RadIotherApy iN Oligo-Progressive MalignanT Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2019 to 2027Enrolled130ConditionsMalignancy, Breast Cancer Metastatic, Genito-urinaryArmsStereotactic Body Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kara M RuicciRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joelle HelouVerspeeten Family Cancer Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Aisling BarryRadiation Oncology, University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Xiang Y YeDepartment of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
C Anne KochRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer CrokeRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kathy HanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle RodinRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ezra HahnRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer Y Y KwanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael YanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fei-Fei LiuRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia LindsayRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joanna JavorRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philippe BedardDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David CesconDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vikaash KumarDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eitan AmirDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle B NadlerDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ronita LeeDivision of Oncology and Hematology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel M GlicksmanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Standard-of-care management for patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer is changing systemic therapy lines. For patients with limited disease progression ('oligoprogression'), there is interest in treating progressive sites with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) whilst maintaining the current systemic therapy. Here we report on the clinical, quality of life (QOL) and adverse event findings for a cohort of patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer enrolled on the prospective, phase-II RADIANT clinical trial. Methods: RADIANT (NCT04122469) was a single-arm, phase-II basket trial which included patients with oligoprogressive metastatic breast cancer. Patients on systemic therapy for ≥ 3 months received SBRT over 1-5 fractions, targeting up to 5 metastases with radiographic progression. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of change in systemic therapy. Secondary endpoints included local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and health-related (HR) QOL. Analysis by disease histology was planned Results: Thirty patients were enrolled and analyzed; the median age was 60.0 years, 80% had invasive ductal carcinoma and 90% were estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive. Most patients had recurrent metastatic disease (63.3%), while 36.7% had Conclusion: Among this cohort of patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer, SBRT is a safe and promising intervention, with potential to delay next-line systemic therapy. However, as a significant cohort of patients do require a change in systemic therapy within 1-2 years of SBRT, biomarkers are needed to best select patients who would benefit clearly from this approach.

Indexed as

Breast cancerClinical trialImmunotherapyMetastasisRadiationSBRTStereotactic body radiation therapySystemic therapyTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42011409
PMCPMC13091943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.