Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011408›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Outcomes after (chemo)radiotherapy for anal cancer - A nationwide cohort study.

C L Deijen, M Berbée, E D Geijsen, K J Neelis, L Wee, M A B Bakker-Van der Jagt, A H Boer, H M Ceha, J S Cnossen, M P W Intven and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

C L DeijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M BerbéeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
E D GeijsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
K J NeelisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
L WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M A B Bakker-Van der JagtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A H BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
H M CehaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, the Netherlands.
J S CnossenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
M P W IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M M Leseman-HoogenboomZuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Roosendaal, the Netherlands.
G Mulder-EbrahimiInstituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
K MullerRadiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands.
V OppedijkRadiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
O ReerinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Isala Clinic, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
H RüttenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
P H SpruitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
B van TriestDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
LPRGE Dutch Platform for Radiotherapy in Gastro-Enterology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the rarity of anal cancer, real-world data on treatment outcomes are scarce. However, its incidence is increasing in the Netherlands with > 300 new cases and 70 deaths yearly. Standard of care consists of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy alone (RT). The primary objective of our nationwide study was two-fold; to evaluate real-world outcomes after curatively intended CRT/RT for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), and to create a large, high-quality dataset as a national benchmark to guide future prospective research. Material and methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 16 Dutch institutions treating ASCC between 2015 and 2018. Primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), colostomy free survival (CFS), complete response (CR) and toxicity. Results: A total of 462 patients were analysed. Most patients received CRT (85%), with mitomycin-capecitabine as a radiosensitizer in 86% of cases. After median follow-up of 5 years, LRFS for all patients was 80% at 3 years and 78% at 5 years. In total 82% of patients had reached CR, with a median interval to define CR of 3 months. At 3 years, OS, DSS and CFS were 78%, 86% and 88%, respectively. Conclusion: These real-world data demonstrate that curatively intended CRT/RT for ASCC results in LRFS of 80% at 3 years. Organ preservation outcomes were favourable with a CFS of 88% at 3 years. These findings support the current treatment approach as the reference standard for these patients and provide a national benchmark to guide future prospective research.

Indexed as

Anal cancerChemoradiotherapyChemotherapyOutcomesRadiotherapyRisk factorsSquamous cell carcinomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID42011408
PMCPMC13091936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.