ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Large-volume hydrodiatlation under suprascapular nerve block for the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adhesive capsulitis (AC) and postoperative stiffness are characterized by fibrosis and contracture of the glenohumeral joint capsule, leading to progressive stiffness, pain, and limited range of motion (ROM). Diagnosis is confirmed clinically, with patients demonstrating reduced active and passive motion across multiple planes. While injections and physical therapy are commonly used treatments, no consensus exists regarding the most effective approach. This study aimed to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ROM for patients undergoing a large-volume hydrodilatation protocol under a suprascapular nerve block. Methods: Seventy-one patients diagnosed with AC or postoperative stiffness underwent ultrasound-guided large-volume glenohumeral joint hydrodilatation, which included an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block at the suprascapular notch of the scapula prior to the procedure. The hydrodilatation injectate included 9 cc 1% lidocaine and 1 cc triamcinolone, followed by the injection of up to 110 cc sterile saline. ROM was measured immediately before and after the procedure, then at the final clinic follow-up. PROMs were assessed 6+ months following hydrodilatation using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Any further treatments that patients required were also recorded. Results: Of the 71 patients, 47 were female and 24 were male. The mean age was 57 years old. Average pre-procedure forward flexion was 107°, which increased to 156° immediately post-procedure (<0.01) and remained at 153° at final follow-up ( Conclusion: Large-volume hydrodilatation under suprascapular nerve block for AC resulted in significant improvements in ROM and satisfactory PROMs at a minimum 6 months follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.