ArticleTranslational animal science2026
The effect of dose timing schedule on live performance, carcass cutting yields, and fat quality of market gilts managed using GnRF immunization.
Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dose timing on live performance, carcass cutting yields, and fat quality of gilts managed using GnRF immunization. The 15-week study began when 1056 gilts (11 weeks old; average starting weight of 31.7 kg) were allocated by weight to 48 pens, with 22 gilts per pen. Experimental treatments were arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial, with main effects of the interval between dose 1 and dose 2 of the GnRF immunization (4 or 6 weeks; interval between doses) and the interval between dose 2 and marketing [weighted averages of 49 days (long) or 35 days (short); marketing interval]. Age and days on feed were consistent among treatment groups, and pigs were marketed using a similar strategy, in which the heaviest 3-5 pigs from each pen were marketed during study week 12, the next heaviest 3-5 pigs from each pen were marketed during study week 14, and the remaining pigs in each pen were marketed during study week 15. Hot carcass weight and optical probe readings were collected at slaughter. Following slaughter, 283 carcasses (target of 24 per treatment for each marketing event) were selected for evaluation of carcass cutting yields and meat quality. There were limited interactions between interval between doses and marketing interval, with nonsignificant interactions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.