Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011376›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2026

Bibliometric and trend analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

Badr Hafiz, Thamer Alsharif, Abdulaziz Hamzah, Faisal Sukkar, Yousef Bassi, Moaath Alghamdi, Muhammad Tariq, Rakan Bokhari, Saleh Baeesa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Badr HafizDepartment of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer AlsharifNeurosurgery Department, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz HamzahDepartment of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal SukkarNeurosurgery Section, Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yousef BassiCollege of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Moaath AlghamdiNeurosurgery Department, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad TariqDepartment of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rakan BokhariNeurosurgery Section, Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh BaeesaDepartment of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a widely utilized spinal procedure supported by an expanding body of literature. However, the structure, influence, and thematic evolution of the most impactful studies remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to analyze the bibliometric profile of the 100 most-cited ALIF publications. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection. The 100 most-cited ALIF-related articles were identified from database inception through 2025. Extracted data included authorship, journals, institutions, countries, and citation metrics. Analyses used the Bibliometrix R package to evaluate productivity, collaboration, and keyword trends. Results: Dataset included 463 authors across 28 journals, with a mean of 5.4 authors per article and international collaboration (9%). The literature demonstrated high impact, with a mean document age of 15.2 years and an average of 125.4 citations per article. Publication output was concentrated in Conclusion: Influential ALIF literature is highly concentrated and shaped by both historically cited studies and emerging high-impact work. The findings highlight a potential divergence between citation prominence and evidence hierarchy, emphasizing the need for critical appraisal and more robust prospective research. This analysis provides a structured framework to understand historical trends, current priorities, and future directions in ALIF research.

Indexed as

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)Bibliometric analysisCitation classicsCollaborative networksIntellectual structureSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID42011376
PMCPMC13092197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.