ArticlePeerJ2026
Persistent loss of animal diversity on a rocky shore over nine decades and across multiple investigators.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term ecological monitoring inevitably requires a 'passing of the quadrat' from one investigator to another. Here we present the challenge and opportunity of inferring biodiversity change over time and across investigators using a rocky intertidal case study. An intertidal transect was established and first surveyed in 1931-1933, then resurveyed in detail in 1993. After 1993, the transect was surveyed 16 more times, with surveys nested within four distinct investigator eras. We addressed two goals with our dataset. First, we used a causal framework to detect temporal change in biodiversity (species richness, Hill-Shannon and Hill-Simpson diversity, and species evenness) and then attribute biodiversity change to seawater temperature. Second, we tested the hypothesis that population change in abundance was associated with the geographic range of species. Over thirty years (1993-2023), species richness showed no linear trend but was associated with investigator era; we hypothesize that sampling effort contributed to this effect. In contrast, we observed weak linear declines in the diversity of common taxa (Hill-Shannon), dominant taxa (Hill-Simpson), and evenness over the recent thirty years, but no evidence of investigator effects. We estimated a weak negative effect of maximum sea surface temperature on Hill-Shannon diversity (-0.25 common taxa °C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.