ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026
The risk of acute thromboembolic cardiovascular events in association with use of chondroitin sulphate: A comparative, propensity score-matched cohort study using Swiss healthcare claims data.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute thromboembolic cardiovascular events in new chondroitin (sulphate) users compared to new users of intraarticular (IA) steroids in a propensity score (PS)-matched cohort study. Method: Using Swiss healthcare claims data (2013-2022, study period), we identified new users of chondroitin and IA steroids aged 40-99 years. Primary outcome was an inpatient-diagnosed myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack. The secondary outcome additionally included all-cause mortality. After PS matching, we calculated incidence rates (IRs) and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In a sensitivity analysis, we restricted to patients with imaging of the hip/knee and a claim for NSAIDs within 365 days before cohort entry to increase likelihood of them having osteoarthritis (OA). Results: After matching, we included 36,659 chondroitin users and 37,501 IA steroid users. Matched IRs for the primary outcome were 9.6 for chondroitin and 11.9/1000 py for IA steroids, yielding a matched (m)HR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.95). The sensitivity analysis yielded a mHR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.56-1.11). IRs for the secondary outcome were 18.9 and 29.2/1000 py for chondroitin and IA steroid users, resulting in a mHR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.75). Conclusion: Chondroitin use was associated with a slightly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to IA steroid use. However, residual confounding by patient frailty may explain the finding to some degree, given the excess mortality in the comparison group. Further research is needed to corroborate or refute a potential cardioprotective effect of chondroitin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.