ArticleJSES international2026
Shoulder proprioceptive sense of force in chronic anterior instability: performance and clinical associations.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proprioception, our internal awareness of limb position and movement, is essential for shoulder stability through neuromuscular control. Following traumatic anterior instability (TAI), proprioceptive impairments may develop, potentially affecting upper limb function. These deficits vary across individuals. Previous studies have focused primarily on joint position sense and kinesthesia, while sense of force (SoF) deficits in chronic TAI remain largely unexplored. Moreover, clinical assessments are multifactorial and time-limited, and little is known about how SoF relates to common clinical measures. This cross-sectional study aimed to (1) determine whether chronic TAI is associated with shoulder SoF deficits compared with the contralateral side and a control group (CG) and (2) explore potential associations between SoF, maximal voluntary isometric strength (MVIC), and clinical questionnaires used in shoulder instability assessment. Methods: Participants aged 18-40 with TAI underwent SoF assessment in both shoulders. A matched CG (n = 37) was tested only on the dominant arm. Proprioceptive accuracy (PA) during SoF testing, MVIC, and shoulder questionnaires (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (short version)) were collected for analysis. Results: The TAI group included 37 participants (27% female, n = 10; 73% male, n = 27), subdivided into non-surgical (TAINS, n = 18) and surgical (TAIS, n = 19) subgroups. Analysis revealed a significant main effect of intensity on PA, F(1,36) = 26.835, Conclusion: Chronic TAI subjects showed no difference in SoF performance compared with the CG. Associations between SoF, MVIC, and clinical questionnaire outcomes were minimal, emphasizing the importance of interpreting clinical assessments collectively rather than in isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.