ArticleKidney international reports2026
Systematic Review of Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Monoclonal Ig Deposition Disease.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kidney Transplantation in Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease: Time to Revisit Old Assumptions.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Historical case series of monoclonal Ig deposition disease (MIDD) after kidney transplantation (KTx) reported unfavorable outcomes. Recent case series support more acceptable outcomes in selected patients. Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of case series and case reports using available individual participant data (IPD). We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and gray literature. Recurrence-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival from the time of KTx were analyzed. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to publication type, hematologic response before KTx, exposure to novel agents, and era. Results: Eighty-seven kidney allografts were included from case series and case reports between 1986 and 2023. During the median follow-up of 46 months, recurrence occurred in 47 allografts (54%), at a median of 30 months after KTx. The estimated median recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in patients who achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) hematologic response or better. Graft survival at 5- and 10-years was 67.1% and 45.9% respectively. Recurrence was the main cause of the graft loss in the majority. Among the patients who faced recurrence, the median time from recurrence to graft failure was longer in those who received clone-directed therapies (62 vs. 11 months, Conclusion: More recent outcomes of patients with MIDD after KTx are favorable. Clone-directed therapies in recurrent disease appear to prolong graft survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.