ArticleMechanobiology in medicine2026
Biomechanical analysis of lumbar oblique manipulation for lumbar disc herniation with different protrusion subtypes.
Article in Mechanobiology in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing lumbar therapy: a biomechanical study of oblique pulling manipulation under different postures.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar oblique manipulation (LOM) is one of the commonly used conservative treatments for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Compared with surgical interventions, its non - invasive nature provides patients with greater comfort and reduces treatment resistance, resulting in its widespread clinical application. However, manual techniques may vary according to the type of disc herniation and could potentially lead to adverse outcomes. For which LDH patients is LOM truly suitable? This question deserves further consideration. To investigate the specific characteristics of LOM for different LDH types, this study constructed six representative finite element models of LDH and analyzed the biomechanical effects of LOM on each model. The findings suggest that for patients with herniations at the same level as the affected nerve root, LOM is safer when performed in the healthy lateral position, regardless of the presence of significant compression symptoms. Conversely, for patients with pronounced neurological compression symptoms, especially those with disc protrusions extending beyond the nerve root level, the technique may worsen disc and nerve root compression. This study provides the first bilateral LOM biomechanical evidence across six LDH subtypes, which can be used as a guide for safer clinical positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.