ReviewHealth science reports2026
Impact of
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Infections are an important cause of male infertility, yet the effects of Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from their inception through October 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Egger's regression test and examination of funnel plots were applied to evaluate potential publication bias. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were carried out to identify possible sources of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was performed to verify the robustness of the overall estimates. Results: Across 11 eligible studies, our analyses demonstrated that infertile men harboring Conclusion: Collectively, these findings support a potential relationship between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.