Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011268›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

Redefining holistic care for gynecologic hereditary cancer syndromes through universal social work referrals.

Pranya Gaddipati, Sonali Iyer, Max Kirby, Isabelle R Chandler, Michelle Primiano, Alex Raghunandan, Benjamin Grant, Tina Karimaghaie, Ravi N Sharaf, Melissa K Frey and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Lights genes action: Video strategy forGynecologic oncology reports · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pranya GaddipatiWeill Cornell Medical College of Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sonali IyerGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Max KirbyGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Isabelle R ChandlerGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Michelle PrimianoGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Alex RaghunandanGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin GrantGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Tina KarimaghaieGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ravi N SharafGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Melissa K FreyGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Emily S EpsteinGenetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes often experience unique psychosocial challenges that may not be fully addressed in routine clinical care. Support with communicating genetic risk to family, coordinating complex medical care, and managing distress may enhance emotional well-being and improve engagement in recommended cancer prevention strategies. Incorporating social work services into gynecologic hereditary cancer care may address these unmet needs and promote a more comprehensive, patient-centered care model. Methods: From April through September 2024, all patients with hereditary cancer syndromes followed at a gynecologic oncology clinic were offered referral to a genetics social worker. For patients who accepted, the social worker documented their primary areas of interest. Uptake of social work services was examined in relation to patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Results: Among 124 patients offered referrals, 102 (82.3%) accepted. New patients to the gynecologic oncology clinic were significantly more likely to engage with social work services vs. established patients (91.2% vs. 74.6%, p = 0.02). No other variables were associated with interest in social work. Among those who engaged with the social worker, the most frequently requested domains of assistance included mental health resources (36.9%), support groups (35.4%), family testing (32.3%), and care coordination (30.8%). Discussion: Integration of social work services into gynecologic hereditary cancer care resulted in high patient engagement. The strongest uptake was observed among new patients, underscoring the importance of providing early access to support. Overall, patients expressed substantial interest in mental health resources, support groups, family testing, and care-coordination assistance, highlighting critical areas for enhanced care delivery.

Indexed as

Hereditary cancer syndromesPsychosocial supportQuality improvementSocial work

Identifiers

PMID42011268
PMCPMC13091773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.