Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011208›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Differential Effects of T-Cell Inhibitors and Antimetabolites on Graft Survival in High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Tertiary Center Experience.

Susama Chokesuwattanaskul, Thanapong Somkijrungroj, Fanxiu Xiong, John A Gonzales, Vannarut Satitpitakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susama ChokesuwattanaskulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanapong SomkijrungrojDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Fanxiu XiongFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
John A GonzalesFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Vannarut SatitpitakulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of T-cell inhibitors versus antimetabolites on graft survival in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), with a particular focus on cases of repeat grafting. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: All high-risk eyes undergoing optical PKP between 2015 and 2022 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: The medical records of 293 high-risk eyes undergoing optical PKP were reviewed. The use of any systemic steroid-sparing immunosuppressive (IS) agents was identified. In practice, all patients received either T-cell inhibitors or antimetabolites. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were applied to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the effect of systemic IS therapies on time to graft failure in high-risk PKP, adjusting for demographics, indications for PKP, and possible risk factors of graft failure. Main Outcome Measures: Time to graft failure in high-risk PKP. Results: Among 281 high-risk eyes undergoing PKP, 217 received no IS medications, whereas 64 received IS medications (31 T-cell inhibitors, 49 antimetabolites). Notably, all eyes received topical corticosteroid immediately postoperation. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for influential risk factors for graft failure, using any systemic IS was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.42-1.18), though not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis, T-cell inhibitors statistically significantly reduced the risk of graft failure (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.95), whereas antimetabolites did not (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.58-1.63). Among eyes with 2 or more previous grafts, IS use demonstrated a protective effect on graft failure (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.94), but no benefit was observed for first-time grafts. Conclusions: Among IS medications for high-risk PKP, T-cell inhibitors, in addition to topical corticosteroid, significantly improved graft survival, whereas antimetabolites showed no benefit. The protective effect was most pronounced in repeat transplantation, suggesting T-cell inhibitors should be preferentially considered for eyes undergoing multiple grafts. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

AntimetabolitesGraft survivalHigh-risk corneal transplantationImmunosuppressiveT-cell inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42011208
PMCPMC13092183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.