ArticleAnnals of vascular diseases2026
Mechanical Evaluation of Stenting for Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis: A Study on Stent Size.
Article in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously analyzed a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm model and elucidated that saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms manifest abnormal hemodynamic factors from an early stage and that stenting improves these factors. In this study, we analyzed a model of a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm implanted with stents of different diameters and lengths to determine the optimal stent size for improving hemodynamic factors. The stent diameter was set in 3 patterns as follows: 24 mm, the same as the aortic diameter; 26.4 mm, a 10% increase; and 28.8 mm, a +20% increase. The stent length was extended 10 mm vertically from the 28-mm length of the aneurysmal portion to 50 and 70 mm in 2 patterns, for a total of 6 types. The analysis revealed that all hemodynamic factors improved for all sizes compared with those prior to stenting. Streamlines entering the aneurysm were reduced with larger stent diameters; however, no difference in length was observed. Moreover, no clear differences in the mean flow velocity within the aneurysm, maximum shear stress, or pressure loss coefficient between the models were observed. An implanted stent was sufficient in terms of efficacy if it adhered to the aortic wall and covered the saccular aneurysm area. (This is a secondary publication from J Jpn Coll Angiol 2024; 64: 69-78.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.