Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011193›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular diseases2026

Mechanical Evaluation of Stenting for Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis: A Study on Stent Size.

Masanori Murakami, Fei Jiang, Seigo Osakada, Tatsuo Yamashita, Xian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masanori MurakamiCardiovascular Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kanmon Medical Center, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Fei JiangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Seigo OsakadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Tatsuo YamashitaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Xian ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Yamaguchi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously analyzed a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm model and elucidated that saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms manifest abnormal hemodynamic factors from an early stage and that stenting improves these factors. In this study, we analyzed a model of a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm implanted with stents of different diameters and lengths to determine the optimal stent size for improving hemodynamic factors. The stent diameter was set in 3 patterns as follows: 24 mm, the same as the aortic diameter; 26.4 mm, a 10% increase; and 28.8 mm, a +20% increase. The stent length was extended 10 mm vertically from the 28-mm length of the aneurysmal portion to 50 and 70 mm in 2 patterns, for a total of 6 types. The analysis revealed that all hemodynamic factors improved for all sizes compared with those prior to stenting. Streamlines entering the aneurysm were reduced with larger stent diameters; however, no difference in length was observed. Moreover, no clear differences in the mean flow velocity within the aneurysm, maximum shear stress, or pressure loss coefficient between the models were observed. An implanted stent was sufficient in terms of efficacy if it adhered to the aortic wall and covered the saccular aneurysm area. (This is a secondary publication from J Jpn Coll Angiol 2024; 64: 69-78.).

Indexed as

abdominal aortic aneurysmfluid–structure interactionpressure loss coefficientwall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID42011193
PMCPMC13092364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.