ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
Liquid biopsies for the diagnosis of early-stage gastric cancer: A 5-year systematic review.
Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive method for early cancer detection, leveraging circulating biomarkers such as nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, and tumor cells. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the emerging role of liquid biopsy as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of primary gastric cancer, focusing on the past five years of published research. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and based on the PICO framework, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed and Scopus databases, yielding 620 articles. After screening and eligibility assessment, 16 studies were included. Quality evaluation was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool and Analytical Validation Summaries. Results: The included studies demonstrated consistently high diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy-derived biomarkers. Notably, circulating non-coding RNAs-particularly miRNAs, circRNAs, lncRNAs, and tsRNAs-showed high sensitivity and specificity in early-stage gastric cancer detection. DNA methylation signatures, cfDNA fragmentomics, lipidomic profiles, and folate receptor-positive CTCs, also emerged as valuable diagnostic modalities. Most studies reported area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.85, with several outperforming conventional serum markers, such as CEA and CA19-9. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy holds significant promise as a non-invasive, accurate diagnostic approach for early gastric cancer. RNA-based and cfDNA-based biomarkers, in particular, exhibit strong potential for integration into routine screening protocols. Further large-scale, prospective validation studies are warranted to support clinical translation and standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.