Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011161›Full record

ArticleSocial studies of science2026

Enacting Protected Areas Through Monitoring: Knowledge Practices as Multispecies Spatiotemporal Achievements in Neusiedler See-Seewinkel National Park.

Erik Aarden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social studies of science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erik AardenDepartment of Society, Knowledge and Politics, University of Klagenfurt, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2085-2919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected areas are seen as one of the primary instruments to halt biodiversity loss, but it is not always clear if a protected status designation contributes to the preservation of endangered species and ecosystems. One way to address the issue is through monitoring, the regular counting and measuring of 'nature'. However, more than merely representing nature in a protected area, monitoring enacts nature. In this article, I explore a specific protected area by way of an ethnography of different monitoring programs in Neusiedler See-Seewinkel National Park in Austria. Characterized as a quintessentially naturecultural landscape, the formal boundaries of the national park only partially match when and where monitoring is done. To make sense of the differences, I trace practices of monitoring of the soda lake ecosystem, vegetation, and geese as multispecies activities, shaped by both human and non-human performances in and of space and time. I thereby suggest considering protected area monitoring as a distinct knowledge practice that contributes to shaping protected areas as lived conservation infrastructures.

Indexed as

Austriaconservationmonitoringmultispecies ethnographyprotected areasspacetime

Identifiers

PMID42011161
PMCPMC13646433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.