Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42011066›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2026

Real-World Utilization Patterns of Toxoplasmosis Diagnostic Testing in Korea: A Large-Scale Laboratory-Based Study.

Rihwa Choi, Sang Gon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rihwa ChoiLaboratory Medicine Center, GC Labs, Yongin, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-2248
Sang Gon LeeLaboratory Medicine Center, GC Labs, Yongin, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-5811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasmosis is primarily diagnosed using serologic assays, while PCR is applied selectively in specific clinical contexts. However, data on real-world utilization patterns of toxoplasmosis diagnostic tests remain limited, particularly in settings where the disease is relatively uncommon.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed laboratory data for Toxoplasma gondii PCR, IgG, and IgM assays performed for clinical purposes between January 2020 and December 2024 at a large referral laboratory in Korea. Test utilization patterns, test combinations, test results measured after the initial test, and factors associated with test positivity were evaluated using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

resultsA total of 28,668 subjects underwent at least one toxoplasmosis-related test. Serologic testing accounted for the majority of initial evaluations, whereas PCR was used infrequently and primarily as a context-dependent adjunct. IgM positivity tended to be associated with subsequent testing after the initial test, while IgG positivity was more commonly observed with increasing age. Tests performed after the initial test were variably performed. PCR positivity suggestive of acute infection was rare and was observed only in cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous fluid specimens. Overall, testing patterns varied across institutions.

conclusionsThis large-scale study provides an overview of real-world toxoplasmosis diagnostic test utilization in Korea. Considerable variation was observed in test utilization patterns, including IgM use and testing performed after the initial test. Further studies incorporating clinical information are needed to clarify the clinical context and implications of these patterns.

Indexed as

Serologic TestsToxoplasmosisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ProtozoanChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MInfantAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Mimmunoglobulin Gimmunoglobulin Mpolymerase chain reactiontest utilizationtoxoplasma

Identifiers

PMID42011066
PMCPMC13240076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.