ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
A Practical Method for Monitoring Patient Safety Culture: Applying Net Promoter Score and Lot Quality Assurance Sampling.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationalePatient safety culture is a key component of health care quality, yet its integration into routine monitoring systems is often limited. Existing assessments tend to focus on cross‑sectional snapshots rather than providing practical, process‑level information that can support continuous improvement in integrated health care organisations. AIMS AND
objectivesTo design and pilot a practical method for monitoring patient safety culture across key care processes within an integrated health care area, using Net Promoter Score (NPS) and Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) to identify strengths, weaknesses, and improvement priorities.
methodA descriptive cross‑sectional study was conducted in six care processes (primary care, outpatient consultation, hospitalisation, emergencies, surgery, and supportive care). Patient safety culture was assessed using validated AHRQ instruments (HSOPS and MOSPS), administered via structured telephone interviews. NPS was used to summarise favourable and unfavourable perceptions into a single polarity score. LQAS was applied to classify each process into acceptable or unacceptable results and to identify priority improvement lots. A process‑level monitoring plan was developed based on dimensions with critical NPS values and rejected lots.
resultsA total of 126 professionals participated (88% response rate). Safety‑culture perceptions varied substantially across processes. 'Teamwork within units' emerged as a consistent strength, while 'work pressure and pace' and 'staffing' were frequent concerns. NPS showed 93% concordance with AHRQ classifications. LQAS identified 132 rejected lots (49.5%), including 25 (9.4%) flagged as high‑priority weaknesses.
conclusionThe combined use of NPS and LQAS offers a practical, scalable approach for monitoring patient safety culture at the process level. This method supports prioritisation, resource allocation, and the integration of safety‑culture information into routine governance and improvement activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.