Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010995›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026

Advising Voluntary Assisted Dying Patients About the Option of Organ Donation: Ethical and Practical Considerations.

Leo Nunnink, Melanie Jansen, Fabian Jaramillo, Wade Stedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo NunninkUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-8690
Melanie JansenUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Fabian JaramilloMetro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Wade StedmanRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) provides a pathway to organ donation distinct from typical pathways requiring withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support. Patients considering VAD now have the option to be donors and benefit others through donation and transplantation. This is not widely known in the community. In this article, we consider the ethical issues in advising VAD patients about the option of organ donation. We balance patient autonomy against the risks of coercion and conflict of interest. All eligible patients should be advised about the option so they can make an informed decision. However, the timing and source of information are critical in ensuring that patients can make a well-considered, ethically sound choice. We propose a pathway for provision of information about organ donation for patients considering VAD.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySuicide, AssistedTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsCommunicationDecision MakingHumansBioethicsEuthanasiaTissue and organ procurement

Identifiers

PMID42010995
PMCPMC13096760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.