Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010893›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026

Hidden Persuasion: Big Alcohol's Tactics on Social Media.

Georgia McLellan, Antonia Lyons, Acushla Sciascia, Rawiri Nicholls, Nason Maani, Taisia Huckle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgia McLellanAUT Business School, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Antonia LyonsCentre for Addiction Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-3268
Acushla SciasciaMāpuna Consultants Ltd, Porirua, New Zealand.
Rawiri NichollsShore and Whariki, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nason MaaniGlobal Health Policy Unit, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Taisia HuckleShore and Whariki, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0669-0685

Funding

Marsden Fund 23-MAU-022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol marketing is harmful as it increases the consumption of alcohol, age of initiation of alcohol and hazardous drinking patterns. Dark nudges and sludge are behavioural economics techniques used to exploit cognitive biases to manipulate consumers to make decisions that are not in their best interest. These have previously been described in alcohol industry corporate responsibility materials and in digital tools and apps funded by the alcohol industry and are potentially being used in alcohol advertising including on social media. Dark nudges and sludge are potentially very influential within digital environments due to the potential for targeted advertising, the ubiquity of smartphones, the pervasive use of social media and the nature of the marketing, which is often difficult to identify. This commentary provides background information about the use of dark nudges and sludge on social media platforms, outlines key concerns in this space for critical health researchers, and outlines some future research directions for examining the alcohol industry's use of dark nudges and sludge in digital environments, including social media.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingMarketingPersuasive CommunicationSocial MediaAdvertisingDigital MediaHumansMedia Exposurealcohol marketingcognitive biasesdark nudges and sludgedigital manipulationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42010893
PMCPMC13096705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.