ArticleAnaesthesia and intensive care2026
Patient experiences and outcomes from a novel multidisciplinary preoperative shared decision-making clinic.
Article in Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We established a novel multidisciplinary preoperative clinic in 2023 to support elderly, frail and/or comorbid patients to make decisions about surgical treatment based on their goals and values. We aimed to examine the characteristics, postoperative outcomes and quality of shared decision-making (SDM) for patients seen in this clinic in its first year. We collected data regarding patient demographics, preoperative status and postoperative outcomes via review of the medical record, and conducted a telephone interview to assess quality of SDM via the CollaboRATE-5 and Decision Regret Scales. Seventy-one patients attended the clinic in 2023, with a median age of 78 years. Eighty-six percent of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification of 3 or 4, and 69% were frail (Clinical Frailty Scale of 4 or more). Sixty-five percent of patients elected to proceed with surgery and 35% elected not to proceed. At follow-up, approximately 14 months after initial SDM review, 58% of patients had had surgery, with a median postoperative hospital length of stay of four days, and a median of 25.5 days alive and at home within 30 days of surgery. Telephone interview was successfully conducted with 24 patients. The CollaboRATE-5 top score was reported by 63% of respondents, and the median Decision Regret Scale score was 7.5 (interquartile range 0-25) suggesting a high quality of SDM. In the first year of its operation, our multidisciplinary preoperative clinic delivered high-quality SDM to a cohort of high-risk surgical patients, with those proceeding to surgery generally experiencing favourable postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.