ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst: male partner involvement in modern family planning and its effect on women's mental health in Northern Ghana - a community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily planning is essential in promoting reproductive health and improving overall well-being. However, male involvement in modern family planning remains relatively low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and limited male participation has been associated with challenges in women’s mental health due to lack of partner support.
objectivesTo determine the level of male partner involvement in modern family planning utilization and its effect on women’s mental health in the Northern Region of Ghana.
methodsA community-based cross-sectional study design was employed using a multi-stage sampling method. Data were collected from 1,684 respondents via structured questionnaires and the DASS-21 scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including regression analysis, were performed using STATA v17.
resultThe study found that 68.2% of males were not involved in family planning, with 501 (29.8%) reporting good mental health. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that women aged 31–45 years were 57% less likely to have male partner involvement in family planning compared to those in the 18–25 age group (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.01–0.51, p = 0.001). Women who reported societal beliefs hindering male partner participation in family planning had 60% lower odds of their partner being involved (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.23–1.06, p = 0.005). Women with tertiary education were twice as likely to have male partner involvement compared to those with JHS/Middle school education (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.20–4.54, p = 0.000). Also women whose partners were not involved in family planning had 12.3 times higher odds of reporting poor mental health compared to those whose partners were involved (AOR = 12.3, 95% CI: 6.1-14.34, p = 0.000).
conclusionThis study found low male involvement in modern family planning utilization. Factors such as age, education, employment, and cultural beliefs were identified as influencing male participation in family planning. Increased male involvement contributes positively to women’s mental well-being. These findings underline the need for greater engagement of male partners in family planning programs and emphasize the importance of supporting women’s mental health through improved communication and collaborative healthcare practices. Integrating mental health support into family planning programs and implementing community-based approaches can enhance male participation in reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.