ArticleGenome medicine2026
Allele-specific suppression of pathogenic bestrophin-1 transcripts by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BEST4⁺ cells: a potential hub of intestinal ion transport and diarrhea manipulation.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreating autosomal dominant gene mutations remains challenging, particularly when mutations convey a gain-of-function or a dominant-negative effect, as standard gene supplementation strategies often fail to counteract the pathogenic allele.
methodsIn this study, we employed human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium (hiPSC-RPE) to investigate allele-specific CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing as a potential treatment for Best disease (BD), an autosomal dominant macular dystrophy caused by over 250 distinct mutations in the bestrophin-1 (BEST1) gene. We designed and evaluated single guide RNAs (sgRNA) targeting three known BEST1 mutations (p.(R218C), p.(A243V), and p.(I295del)), assessing their impact on BD-associated hiPSC-RPE phenotypes and BEST1 channel function. Computationally predicted sgRNAs were rigorously tested for on-target efficiency, allele specificity and genome-wide off-target activities.
resultsWe found that shortening sgRNA length improved specificity in some cases, while introducing an additional mismatch generally compromised editing efficiency. Notably, only one of the three mutations yielded an sgRNA with both high cleavage efficiency and undetectable off-target effects in hiPSC-RPE cells. We then explored the consequences of allele-specific editing on BEST1 expression and function in clonal BD hiPSC-RPE lines. Eliminating the mutant BEST1 transcript led to enhanced BEST1 localization, improved protein stability and restoration of anion transport function.
conclusionsTaken together, our findings support allele-specific gene editing as a viable therapeutic strategy for selected BEST1 mutations, while underscoring the necessity for rigorous testing of computationally designed sgRNAs, given their mutation- and context-dependent variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.