ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk in Respiratory Patients.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pressure ulcers represent a significant healthcare challenge among respiratory patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram based on machine learning algorithms to identify patients at high risk for pressure ulcer development. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 263 respiratory patients (166 with pressure ulcers). Patients were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Potential risk factors were identified through univariate logistic regression. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression selected 17 significant predictors, from which 10 variables with optimal predictive values were incorporated into a nomogram model. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). The final nomogram incorporated 10 predictors: age, albumin, C-reactive protein, serum sodium, history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, urinary incontinence, length of hospital stay and Braden sensory perception score. The model demonstrated excellent discriminative ability with AUCs of 0.865 (95% CI: 0.816-0.914) in the training cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.783-0.891) in the testing cohort. Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: training cohort χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.