Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010659›Full record

ArticlePopulation health metrics2026

The changing landscape of substance use disorders over 30 years: insights on US state disparities and policy from the global burden of disease study.

Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, Wendy Shang, Najmeh Mohammadi, Kaveh Dehghan, Sanam Ahadi, Misagh Naderi, Anaheed Shirazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health metrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shahrzad Bazargan-HejaziAlice L. Walton School of Medicine, 1001, NE J Street, Bentonville, 72712, AR, USA. shahrzad.bazargan@alwmed.org.
Wendy ShangDepartment of Health and Life Sciences, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Najmeh MohammadiDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Kaveh DehghanCollege of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sanam AhadiCollege of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Misagh NaderiCollege of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anaheed ShiraziDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUDs) remain a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality in the United States. This study described trends in the burden of SUDs from 1990 to 2019 by substance, sex, and age, and examined whether state-level policy environments and behavioral health budgets differed across states with the highest and lowest SUD-related disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

methodsWe conducted a descriptive epidemiologic study using Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 estimates for alcohol, opioid, cocaine, amphetamine, cannabis, and other drug use disorders in the United States. DALYs were the primary outcome and were examined by sex, age, substance, and year. To contextualize state-level disparities, we descriptively summarized behavioral health budget allocations and selected policy domains in states with the three highest and three lowest DALY rates for drug use disorders and alcohol use disorders.

resultsFrom 1990 to 2019, prevalent SUD cases in the United States increased from 12.6 million to 19.5 million, and the age-standardized DALY rate for SUDs rose from 725.5 to 2,274.4 per 100,000 population. Opioid use disorders showed the largest increases in both prevalence (618.5%) and DALY rates (643.7%), becoming the leading contributor to SUD-related burden. Cocaine and amphetamine use disorders showed smaller increases in prevalence but larger increases in DALY rates, whereas alcohol use disorder changed modestly and cannabis-related DALY rates remained unchanged. In 2019, the age-standardized DALY rate for SUDs was higher among males than females (2,486.8 vs. 1,722.6 per 100,000 population). Opioid-related DALYs peaked in early adulthood, whereas alcohol-related DALYs peaked in midlife. Substantial geographic variation was observed: drug-related DALY rates were highest in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio and lowest in Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota, while alcohol-related DALY rates were highest in New Mexico, Alaska, and the District of Columbia and lowest in New Jersey, Maryland, and Texas. States with lower burden generally reflected more prevention-oriented and coordinated policy environments, although the presence of policy alone did not consistently correspond to lower burden.

conclusionsThe burden of SUDs in the United States increased substantially over three decades, driven primarily by opioids and with marked variation across sex, age, and geography. Descriptive comparisons suggest that policy context and behavioral health investment may help shape state-level differences, but implementation, treatment access, and broader structural conditions also matter. Coordinated, equitable, and adequately resourced prevention, treatment, and harm-reduction strategies are needed to reduce persistent disparities in SUD-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHealth PolicyHumansMalePrevalenceUnited StatesAlcohol use disorderDisability-adjusted life yearsGlobal burden of disease studyHealth policyOpioid use disorderSubstance use disordersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42010659
PMCPMC13224409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.