ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Patient and surgeon perspectives on shared decision-making in hip and knee osteoarthritis treatment: a qualitative exploratory study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNavigating the various surgical and non-surgical options for treating osteoarthritis (OA) presents a significant challenge for patients. Determining the optimal treatment involves carefully weighing each option’s benefits, risks, and consequences. What constitutes the “best treatment”—whether surgical or non-surgical—is often subjective and shaped by individual circumstances and personal preferences. While shared decision-making, supported by in-consult patient decision aids, has proven valuable in helping patients and clinicians clarify values and choose the most suitable treatment, its integration into orthopaedic consultations remains limited. This study aims to identify the key decision-making factors relevant to patients and surgeons in the context of hip or knee OA.
methodsThis qualitative exploratory study involved 15 field observations guided by the five-item Observing Patient Involvement instrument and two focus group discussions (FGs) with patients (n = 14) and their relatives (n = 4) and two (FGs) with orthopaedic surgeons (n = 12). The data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsField observations revealed variations in consultation practices, particularly in duration, information sharing, and patient-surgeon dynamics. FGs identified six main themes influencing treatment decisions. Patient-derived themes emphasized the critical role of the patient-surgeon relationship in building confidence, the importance of weighing treatment options, and the long decision-making process that often led patients to delay their appointment with the surgeon until they felt surgery was their only option. Surgeon-derived themes highlighted the need for more standardised information, scepticism about the shared decision-making approach, and concerns that patients with predefined treatment decisions might hinder the shared decision-making process.
conclusionsThis study underscores the complexity of decision-making for patients with severe hip or knee OA, highlighting factors such as symptom severity and trust in healthcare providers. Its findings suggest a need for a more standardised approach to information delivery and the implementation of shared decision-making to improve patient satisfaction with joint replacement outcomes. Introducing in-consult patient decision aids earlier in the decision-making process could help prepare and inform patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.