Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010598›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Post exercise hydration responses to an electrolyte, glycerol, and creatine supplement in horses: a preliminary study.

Russell Peterson, Jacquelyn Dietrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell PetersonIndependent Researcher, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. pacificeq2020@yahoo.com.
Jacquelyn DietrichIndependent Researcher, Oakland Hills, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrolyte supplementation is utilized to support hydration in horses. However, limited data are available on formulations that include osmotically active compounds such as glycerol and creatine. These additional ingredients may enhance fluid retention, yet their physiologic effects in equine athletes have not been evaluated. This preliminary study assessed hematologic responses, body mass recovery, and voluntary water intake following moderate exercise with and without supplementation using a commercially available hydration supplement containing electrolytes, creatine, and glycerol. Six healthy quarter horses completed two conditions in a cross-over design: a water-only condition and a supplemented condition. Each study day consisted of a uniform moderate exercise regimen, a recovery period, and a 3-hour hydration period. Hematocrit and hemoglobin decreased over time in both conditions, while total protein concentrations were consistently lower in the supplemented condition. Calculated plasma volume (PV) increased to a greater extent with supplementation (p = 0.033). Body mass was preserved during the hydration period in the supplemented condition but declined in the water condition (p = 0.004). Horses also voluntarily consumed more water when supplemented (p = 0.0079). These preliminary findings suggest that an electrolyte supplement containing glycerol and creatine may augment post-exercise rehydration by promoting increased water intake, supporting PV expansion, and improving body mass recovery in moderately exercised horses.

Indexed as

CreatineDietary SupplementsElectrolytesGlycerolPhysical Conditioning, AnimalAnimalsCross-Over StudiesDrinkingFemaleHorsesMalePost-Exercise RecoveryCreatineElectrolytesGlycerolCreatineElectrolytesGlycerolHorseHydration

Identifiers

PMID42010598
PMCPMC13231614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.