Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010592›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

Periodontal health of endodontically treated molars restored with composite CAD/CAM endocrowns versus stainless steel crowns in Egyptian children: a randomized controlled trial.

Basheer Ali Mabkhot, Sheriene Ezz Eldin Taha, Mostafa Hussein Kamel, Shaimaa Mohamed Sabry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05250609 (Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resin Endocrown as Long Term Interim Restoration Versus Stainless Steel Crown for Endodontically Treated First Permanent Molar in Children), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05250609 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resin Endocrown as Long Term Interim Restoration Versus Stainless Steel Crown for Endodontically Treated First Permanent Molar in Children: Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsDental Caries in ChildrenArmsEndocrown "composite".
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Basheer Ali MabkhotFaculty of Dentistry, Ibn Al-Nafis University, Sana'a, Yemen. basheer.ali@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Sheriene Ezz Eldin TahaPediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Mostafa Hussein KamelMisr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shaimaa Mohamed SabryPediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubgingival crown margins have been linked to chronic gingival inflammation in pediatric patients. This clinical trial evaluated periodontal outcomes in first permanent molars that had undergone root canal therapy and were subsequently restored with either CAD/CAM Composite Endocrowns or stainless steel crowns (SSC). PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-four children aged 10–13 years diagnosed with extensive caries in their first permanent molars were recruited from the Pediatric Dentistry clinics at the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms, where they received either a CAD/CAM Composite Endocrown or an SSC. The primary outcome was periodontal health assessed by Probing Pocket Depth (PPD). Secondary outcomes included Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and radiographic healing evaluated using the Periapical Index (PAI). Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and at 1 week, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.

resultsAt baseline, both groups were comparable in age, gender, and all clinical indices (p > 0.05). During follow-up, mean PPD values were significantly lower in the Endocrown Group than in the SSC Group at all time points (p < 0.001). GI values were significantly lower for Endocrowns at 1 week and 6 months (p = 0.031 and 0.004, respectively). PI values showed no significant intergroup difference (p > 0.05), though both groups improved over time. Radiographically, both groups demonstrated favorable periapical healing with no significant differences in PAI scores after 12 months. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.8).

conclusionWithin the 12-month follow-up period, composite CAD/CAM Endocrowns were associated with significantly reduced probing pocket depth and healthier gingival conditions compared with SSCs, which suggests that CAD/CAM Endocrowns offer a biologically conservative interim restoration for molars treated endodontically in pediatric patients. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05250609. Registered 22 February 2022. Retrospective registration. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05250609.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsComputer-Aided DesignCrownsDental Restoration, PermanentMolarStainless SteelTooth, NonvitalAdolescentChildDental CariesDental Plaque IndexDental Prosthesis DesignEgyptFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansComposite ResinsStainless SteelCAD/CAMEgyptEndocrownPediatric dentistryPeriodontal healthStainless steel crown

Identifiers

PMID42010592
PMCPMC13248274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.