ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
SuperLearner approach for predicting imminent risk of fracture in older Chinese patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis based on their routine blood test markers.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we aimed to develop 2-year fracture prediction models using machine learning approaches based on routine blood test markers in patients newly diagnosed with osteoporosis.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 497 elderly patients (121 men and 376 women) newly diagnosed with osteoporosis without prior fractures at Jinjiang Municipal Hospital between 2011 and 2023. The dataset was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Various readily available medical characteristics at the initial diagnosis of osteoporosis were used to develop the prediction models employing the linear, nonlinear, and SuperLearner approaches. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and the SHapley Additive exPlanation was used to interpret the best-performing models.
resultsIn total, 229 (46.1%) of the 497 participants experienced fractures (at any site) within 2 years of osteoporosis diagnosis. The SuperLearner model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.677, 95% confidence interval: [0.591, 0.762]) for predicting the outcome of interest in the internal validation set. Age at diagnosis, serum sodium levels, and other factors emerged as the top-ranked features. Older patients with hyponatremia, low aspartate transferase levels, and hypocalcemia have an increased imminent risk of fracture.
conclusionsWe successfully developed and validated a fracture risk prediction model for patients newly diagnosed with osteoporosis. The combination of routine blood test markers and advanced machine learning algorithms has demonstrated a predictive value for forecasting fractures in individuals with osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.